CLIDE Project Execution & Deployed Manpower Performance Management Procedure
1. Purpose
CLIDE follows a structured Project Execution & Manpower Performance Management Procedure to ensure that every deployed candidate is adequately trained, assessed, monitored, and periodically evaluated against the requirements of the project.
The objective is to ensure that deployed personnel possess the required competency and continue to deliver consistent performance throughout their association with the project.
CLIDE's Project Execution Cycle
Client Requirement → Candidate Selection → Deployment → Project-Specific Training → Assessment → Competency Confirmation → Site Execution → Continuous Monitoring → Quarterly Performance Review → Client Feedback → Consolidated Evaluation → Corrective Action / Continuation / Replacement
2. Project Execution Procedure
Stage 1 – Deployment of Selected Candidate
After completion of CLIDE's candidate selection process and receipt of client approval, the selected candidate is deployed at the project site.
Before deployment, CLIDE ensures that the candidate is informed about:
- Project scope
- Job responsibilities
- Reporting structure
- Site location and working hours
- Client requirements
- Applicable safety requirements
- Site rules and procedures
- Required documentation
- Expected performance standards
- Code of professional conduct
3. Project-Specific Training & Competency Development
After deployment, CLIDE provides training to the candidate based on the specific requirements and scope of the project.
Training is selected based on:
- Candidate's role and responsibility
- Project scope
- Client requirements
- Site-specific hazards
- Applicable statutory requirements
- Relevant safety standards
- Identified competency gaps
- Candidate's previous experience
Training may be delivered through multiple methods:
1. Paper/Document-Based Learning
Relevant procedures, manuals, guidelines, checklists and study materials.
2. Online Training
Web-based training programmes, digital learning material and online assessments.
3. LMS-Based Training
Structured learning modules, training assignments, assessments and competency records through LMS.
4. Classroom/Physical Training
Instructor-led training, toolbox sessions, workshops and site-based practical training.
5. On-the-Job Training
Practical guidance and mentoring based on actual site activities and project requirements.
4. Training Assessment
Training is followed by an appropriate assessment/evaluation to verify whether the candidate has understood the subject and is capable of applying the knowledge in practical situations.
Assessment may include:
- Written test
- Online assessment
- MCQ-based assessment
- Verbal assessment
- Practical demonstration
- Scenario-based questions
- Case studies
- Supervisor/mentor evaluation
Recommended Assessment Criteria
| Score | Evaluation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 90–100% | Excellent understanding | Competent |
| 80–89% | Very good understanding | Competent |
| 70–79% | Good understanding | Competent |
| 60–69% | Satisfactory | Competent with improvement |
| Below 60% | Requires improvement | Re-training required |
Recommended minimum passing score: 70%.
Candidates scoring below the required threshold are provided additional guidance/re-training and reassessed before being considered fully competent for the relevant activity.
5. Competency Confirmation
After successful completion of the required training and assessment, the candidate is considered project-ready/competency-confirmed for the assigned scope, subject to the applicable client/site requirements.
CLIDE maintains appropriate records of:
- Training conducted
- Training date
- Training subject
- Trainer
- Assessment score
- Assessment status
- Competency status
- Additional training/re-training, where applicable
6. Project Execution & Continuous Monitoring
After competency confirmation, the candidate performs the assigned responsibilities as per the approved project scope.
CLIDE continuously monitors the candidate's performance through:
- Regular interaction with the candidate
- Review of assigned responsibilities
- Work output and quality
- Safety performance
- Compliance with procedures
- Reporting and documentation
- Attendance and discipline
- Client/site feedback
- Achievement of assigned targets
- Observation of site activities
Any identified performance or competency gap is communicated to the candidate and corrective action is initiated.
7. Quarterly Performance Review
CLIDE conducts a quarterly performance review for every deployed candidate.
The review is based on two sources:
A. CLIDE Internal Performance Review
CLIDE evaluates the candidate based on:
- Technical competency
- Quality of work
- Productivity
- Safety awareness
- Compliance
- Documentation/reporting
- Communication
- Discipline
- Teamwork
- Initiative and problem-solving
B. Client Performance Review
CLIDE requests the client to provide quarterly feedback on the candidate using the CLIDE Performance Criteria Sheet.
The client evaluates the candidate based on actual site performance and project requirements.
8. Consolidated Performance Evaluation
CLIDE combines the internal CLIDE evaluation and client feedback to determine the overall performance of the deployed candidate.
Recommended Weightage
| Evaluation Source | Weightage |
|---|---|
| CLIDE Internal Performance Review | 40% |
| Client Performance Review | 60% |
| Total | 100% |
9. Overall Performance Scoring
Both CLIDE and the client can evaluate the candidate on a 100-point scale.
Performance Rating
| Overall Score | Rating | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| 90–100 | Outstanding | Continue deployment; consider recognition |
| 80–89 | Very Good | Continue deployment |
| 70–79 | Good | Continue with normal monitoring |
| 60–69 | Needs Improvement | Improvement plan & closer monitoring |
| Below 60 | Unsatisfactory | Corrective action / replacement may be considered |
Important principle
A candidate's continuation should not be decided only by the numerical score. Any serious issue relating to safety, integrity, misconduct, falsification of records, repeated non-compliance, or violation of critical project requirements should be reviewed separately.
10. Performance Improvement Process
If a candidate's performance falls below the required level, CLIDE initiates a structured improvement process.
Step 1 – Identify Gap
Identify the specific area requiring improvement.
Step 2 – Discuss
Discuss the performance gap with the candidate.
Step 3 – Corrective Action
Provide appropriate guidance, mentoring, training or re-training.
Step 4 – Improvement Period
Allow a defined period for improvement.
Step 5 – Reassessment
Conduct another performance review.
Step 6 – Final Decision
Based on performance improvement and client feedback, CLIDE may:
- Continue the candidate
- Continue with additional monitoring
- Provide further training
- Change responsibilities, where feasible
- Recommend replacement, subject to project/client requirements
11. Client Feedback & Continuous Improvement
CLIDE considers client feedback an important component of project execution.
The quarterly feedback received from the client is reviewed by CLIDE to identify:
- Individual performance gaps
- Training requirements
- Additional competency requirements
- Project-level issues
- Improvement opportunities
- Future manpower requirements
The feedback is also used to continuously improve CLIDE's training and manpower deployment process.
12. Project Execution Philosophy
CLIDE follows the principle:
“Deploy → Train → Assess → Perform → Monitor → Review → Improve.”
Our responsibility does not end with deployment. CLIDE remains engaged throughout the project lifecycle to ensure that deployed personnel remain competent, compliant, and aligned with project expectations.
CLIDE QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE CRITERIA SHEET
This is the separate form you can provide to the client.
CLIDE Management Consultancy Pvt. Ltd.
Quarterly Performance Evaluation – Deployed Personnel
Project Name: _______________________________
Client: ______________________________________
Candidate Name: _____________________________
Designation: _________________________________
Review Period: _______________________________
Reviewer Name & Designation: __________________
Date of Review: ______________________________
A. Performance Evaluation
Please rate the candidate on a scale of 1 to 5:
5 – Outstanding | 4 – Very Good | 3 – Good | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Unsatisfactory
| Sr. No. | Performance Criteria | Weightage | Rating (1–5) | Weighted Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Technical Knowledge & Competency | 15% | ||
| 2 | Understanding of Project Scope & Responsibilities | 10% | ||
| 3 | Quality & Accuracy of Work | 10% | ||
| 4 | Safety Awareness & Compliance | 15% | ||
| 5 | Job Performance & Productivity | 10% | ||
| 6 | Reporting & Documentation | 10% | ||
| 7 | Communication Skills | 10% | ||
| 8 | Teamwork & Coordination | 5% | ||
| 9 | Discipline & Professional Conduct | 5% | ||
| 10 | Initiative & Problem-Solving Ability | 10% | ||
| TOTAL | 100% |
Calculation
Weighted Score = (Rating ÷ 5) × Weightage
Example:
If Technical Knowledge is rated 4/5 and its weightage is 15%:
(4 ÷ 5) × 15 = 12 points
Maximum overall score = 100 points
B. Overall Client Rating
| Score | Rating |
|---|---|
| 90–100 | Outstanding |
| 80–89 | Very Good |
| 70–79 | Good |
| 60–69 | Needs Improvement |
| Below 60 | Unsatisfactory |
Overall Client Score: ______ / 100
Overall Rating: __________________
C. Client Feedback
1. Key Strengths of the Candidate
2. Areas Requiring Improvement
3. Additional Training Required
☐ Yes
☐ No
If yes, please specify:
4. Additional Comments / Observations
D. Client Recommendation
Please select the appropriate option:
☐ Continue deployment – Performance satisfactory
☐ Continue deployment with normal monitoring
☐ Continue deployment with performance improvement plan
☐ Additional training/re-training required
☐ Performance requires close monitoring
☐ Candidate replacement may be considered
Client's specific recommendation/comments:
E. Client Confirmation
Name: __________________________________________
Designation: ____________________________________
Signature: _______________________________________
Date: ___________________________________________
CLIDE Internal Quarterly Review
This section should ideally remain internal to CLIDE rather than being part of the form given to the client.
| Parameter | Weightage | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Competency | 20% | |
| Work Quality & Productivity | 15% | |
| Safety Compliance | 15% | |
| Reporting & Documentation | 10% | |
| Discipline & Attendance | 10% | |
| Communication | 10% | |
| Teamwork | 10% | |
| Initiative & Problem Solving | 10% | |
| Total | 100% |
Final Consolidated Score
Final Score = (Client Score × 60%) + (CLIDE Score × 40%)
For example:
- Client Score = 82/100
- CLIDE Score = 88/100
Final Score:
82 × 60% + 88 × 40% = 84.4/100
Final Rating: Very Good
Process Summary
1. DEPLOY
Candidate selected as per client requirements
↓
2. TRAIN
Project-specific training through Paper / Online / LMS / Classroom / OJT
↓
3. ASSESS
Knowledge & competency assessment
↓
4. CERTIFY / CONFIRM
Candidate confirmed as competent for assigned scope
↓
5. EXECUTE
Candidate performs assigned project responsibilities
↓
6. MONITOR
Continuous CLIDE monitoring
↓
7. QUARTERLY REVIEW
CLIDE Internal Review + Client Performance Review
↓
8. IMPROVE
Training / Mentoring / Corrective Action
↓
9. CONSOLIDATE
60% Client + 40% CLIDE
↓
10. CONTINUE / IMPROVE / REPLACE
Based on documented performance and project requirements